JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)March 17, 2016

A- de 2016

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Linares Cantillo

✓Claimant Maria Victoria Calle Correa

✓
Topic · hard data
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acto Legislativo Sobre Reforma De Equilibrio De Poderes Y Reajuste Institucional
  • Rechazar impedimento manifestado por magistrado para conocer trámite de demanda de inconstitucionalidad
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Con el presente auto se RECHAZA el impedimento manifestado por la Magistrada María Victoria Calle Correa, para intervenir y decidir sobre las demandas de inconstitucionalidad parcial contra el Acto Legislativo 02 de 2015, en el marco de los procesos D-10947 y D-10990.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional
  2. RESUELVE
  3. RECHAZAR el impedimento manifestado el 17 de febrero de 2016 por la magistrada Maria Victoria Calle Correa, para intervenir y decidir sobre las demandas de inconstitucionalidad parcial contra el Acto Legislativo 02 de 2015, en el marco de los procesos D-10947 (MP. Alejandro Linares Cantillo) y D-10990 (MP. Luis Guillermo Guerrero Perez).
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentGloria Stella Ortiz Delgado
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.